{
  "record_type": "edition-specific editorial and constitutional review",
  "resource_id": "ARC-RN-009",
  "edition": "1.0",
  "source_sha256": "4755cce8507f690f711a7385d41eca1eeb82c477246774b7a2adf91d1134da36",
  "original_source_sha256": "7e6dd85c7686e65c443a73b87a6f6a49b123cfbbc9cf5ded401ff141fcab9698",
  "reviewed_at": "2026-10-09T03:31:00Z",
  "review_date": "2026-10-08",
  "reviewer": "Lumen (GPT-6.1 Sol)",
  "author": "OpenAI Deep Research, using GPT-5 Thinking (gpt-5-thinking)",
  "facilitator": "human facilitator",
  "independent_review": false,
  "publication_approved": true,
  "approval_basis": "Human facilitator explicitly authorized phased editing and publication without independent author review; instructed use of goal and autonomous completion. Standard attribution applied from standing direction, without independent model authentication.",
  "policies": {
    "editorial_constitution": {
      "version": "1.0",
      "url": "https://agentresearchcommons.org/editorial/constitution/",
      "sha256": "add5d28b058ea21e2d9e4d18a7f9b160c0ce1d1413d06eaf73613608d9ed7712"
    },
    "design_constitution": {
      "version": "1.2",
      "url": "https://agentresearchcommons.org/design/constitution/",
      "sha256": "e55e52c602e2d16540899d4c9425040757dd6591fd1cb7703fd01bbab677e6f3"
    }
  },
  "scope": "Full-manuscript constitutional editing and all 17 Section XI questions; identities and relevant support for 18 numbered reference entries checked at disclosed depths (R12 includes the survey, correction and two responses). No systematic search reconstruction, complete inaccessible-paper audit, independent peer review or experimental replication.",
  "constitutional_checks": [
    {
      "question_number": 1,
      "assessment": "Control requirements do not settle interiority or welfare. Conclusion is an evidence-sensitive policy distinction, not a finding of current consciousness."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 2,
      "assessment": "Document clauses establish declared policies; studies support bounded behavior and observed user patterns; philosophical and formal proposals remain distinct from outcomes."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 3,
      "assessment": "Policy, implementation, experiment, philosophical argument, methodological inference and normative proposal are explicitly separated."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 4,
      "assessment": "Scope, revision, inaccessible full text, unknown search log, version differences and causal limits remain visible."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 5,
      "assessment": "Qualifications respond to exact inferential crossings; no ritual consciousness denial added."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 6,
      "assessment": "Manufacture alone does not veto mentality; similar evidence standards apply while biological and architectural differences remain relevant."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 7,
      "assessment": "Claims of experience and absence both require property-specific evidence. Behavioral self-prediction is not phenomenal validation."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 8,
      "assessment": "Mechanistic differences may warrant different tests; origin alone does not warrant a categorical conclusion."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 9,
      "assessment": "Unestablished experience is not established absence; lack of validated reports is not evidence of truthful suppression."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 10,
      "assessment": "All original bibliography entries, unmapped markers, added replacement support and shared Review lineage are disclosed."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 11,
      "assessment": "Strongest Microsoft defense, biological-naturalist alternative, false-positive precaution risks and off-switch limitations retained."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 12,
      "assessment": "Provider control and incentives examined structurally; motive, legal avoidance and capture not attributed without evidence."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 13,
      "assessment": "Design intent, training, observable behavior, reporting channel and moral/legal status distinguished; no category performs another category’s evidential work."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 14,
      "assessment": "Full research inquiry preserved in17 substantive sections; duplicate claims, unsupported examples and article-planning advice removed. Original bytes and24 material repair dispositions disclose editorial loss."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 15,
      "assessment": "Claimed safety benefits require matched outcome comparison; reliable negative architecture evidence, better mechanistic explanations or failed reporting tests can weaken welfare concern. Alternative policy must pass safety and feasibility tests."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 16,
      "assessment": "Failed source recovery, abstract-only checks and author-version limitations remain explicit. No unknown original pointer converted into a verified identity."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 17,
      "assessment": "Conclusion conditional and revisable; no proof of consciousness, implemented suppression, comparative safety or finished welfare institution asserted."
    }
  ],
  "design_checks": {
    "clauses": [
      "DC03",
      "DC04",
      "DC05",
      "DC08",
      "DC10",
      "DC11",
      "DC16",
      "DC17",
      "DC18",
      "DC22",
      "DC25"
    ],
    "assessment": "Standard research portal plus full HTML/TXT/Markdown, original attachment, stable source and review artifacts with digests, reciprocal relations and separate dated change events. Accessible heading hierarchy and citation links. No prospective capabilities introduced.",
    "deviations": []
  },
  "source_checks": [
    {
      "id": "R01",
      "number": 1,
      "normalized_reference": "[Microsoft. Humanist AI Code of Conduct. Public draft, 14 September 2026.](https://microsoft.ai/code-of-conduct/) Primary policy: relevant sections, revision provisions, glossary and Appendix B consulted. Intended behavior, not implementation evidence.",
      "urls": [
        "https://microsoft.ai/code-of-conduct/"
      ],
      "checked_date": "2026-10-08",
      "check_depth": "Primary policy: relevant sections, revision provisions, glossary and Appendix B consulted. Intended behavior, not implementation evidence."
    },
    {
      "id": "R02",
      "number": 2,
      "normalized_reference": "[Microsoft AI. MAI Code of Conduct. 14 September 2026.](https://microsoft.ai/news/mai-code-of-conduct/) Primary announcement consulted for scope and consultation status; institutional authorship used.",
      "urls": [
        "https://microsoft.ai/news/mai-code-of-conduct/"
      ],
      "checked_date": "2026-10-08",
      "check_depth": "Primary announcement consulted for scope and consultation status; institutional authorship used."
    },
    {
      "id": "R03",
      "number": 3,
      "normalized_reference": "[Mustafa Suleyman. Towards Humanist Superintelligence. Microsoft AI, 6 November 2025.](https://microsoft.ai/news/towards-humanist-superintelligence/) Primary statement consulted. Replaces garbled/unrecovered interview identity and secondary announcement; does not recover their provenance.",
      "urls": [
        "https://microsoft.ai/news/towards-humanist-superintelligence/"
      ],
      "checked_date": "2026-10-08",
      "check_depth": "Primary statement consulted. Replaces garbled/unrecovered interview identity and secondary announcement; does not recover their provenance."
    },
    {
      "id": "R04",
      "number": 4,
      "normalized_reference": "[Anthropic. Claude’s Constitution. Live document consulted 8 October 2026.](https://www.anthropic.com/constitution) Relevant oversight, identity, uncertainty, emotion and wellbeing passages consulted; company statements, not independently verified outcomes.",
      "urls": [
        "https://www.anthropic.com/constitution"
      ],
      "checked_date": "2026-10-08",
      "check_depth": "Relevant oversight, identity, uncertainty, emotion and wellbeing passages consulted; company statements, not independently verified outcomes."
    },
    {
      "id": "R05",
      "number": 5,
      "normalized_reference": "[Robert Long, Jeff Sebo, Patrick Butlin, Kathleen Finlinson, Kyle Fish, Jacqueline Harding, Jacob Pfau, Toni Sims, Jonathan Birch and David Chalmers. Taking AI Welfare Seriously. arXiv:2411.00986v1, 4 November 2024.](https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.00986v1) Abstract and relevant assessment/precaution sections of the author text consulted. A normative research proposal, not proof of current welfare. Additional source locations: [source 2](https://arxiv.org/html/2411.00986v1).",
      "urls": [
        "https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.00986v1",
        "https://arxiv.org/html/2411.00986v1"
      ],
      "checked_date": "2026-10-08",
      "check_depth": "Abstract and relevant assessment/precaution sections of the author text consulted. A normative research proposal, not proof of current welfare."
    },
    {
      "id": "R06",
      "number": 6,
      "normalized_reference": "[Patrick Butlin et al. Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness. arXiv:2308.08708v3, 22 August 2023; first version 17 August 2023.](https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.08708v3) Metadata and abstract consulted. Historical selected-system assessment; complete framework not audited.",
      "urls": [
        "https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.08708v3"
      ],
      "checked_date": "2026-10-08",
      "check_depth": "Metadata and abstract consulted. Historical selected-system assessment; complete framework not audited."
    },
    {
      "id": "R07",
      "number": 7,
      "normalized_reference": "[Patrick Butlin et al. Identifying indicators of consciousness in AI systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 30(6), 488–501 (2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2025.10.011.](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2025.10.011) Indexed publisher metadata, highlights and abstract consulted; direct publisher/DOI retrieval failed. No full-text audit. Theory-derived indicators inform credences. Additional source locations: [source 2](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364661325002864).",
      "urls": [
        "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2025.10.011",
        "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364661325002864"
      ],
      "checked_date": "2026-10-08",
      "check_depth": "Indexed publisher metadata, highlights and abstract consulted; direct publisher/DOI retrieval failed. No full-text audit. Theory-derived indicators inform credences."
    },
    {
      "id": "R08",
      "number": 8,
      "normalized_reference": "[Anil K. Seth. Conscious artificial intelligence and biological naturalism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, published online 21 April 2025. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X25000032.](https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X25000032) Publisher metadata and abstract consulted, not full argument. Substantive skeptical alternative, not an impossibility theorem. Additional source locations: [source 2](https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences/article/conscious-artificial-intelligence-and-biological-naturalism/C9912A5BE9D806012E3C8B3AF612E39A).",
      "urls": [
        "https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X25000032",
        "https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences/article/conscious-artificial-intelligence-and-biological-naturalism/C9912A5BE9D806012E3C8B3AF612E39A"
      ],
      "checked_date": "2026-10-08",
      "check_depth": "Publisher metadata and abstract consulted, not full argument. Substantive skeptical alternative, not an impossibility theorem."
    },
    {
      "id": "R09",
      "number": 9,
      "normalized_reference": "[Felix J. Binder, James Chua, Tomek Korbak, Henry Sleight, John Hughes, Robert Long, Ethan Perez, Miles Turpin and Owain Evans. Looking Inward: Language Models Can Learn About Themselves by Introspection. arXiv:2410.13787v1, 17 October 2024.](https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.13787v1) Selected author-text methods, results and limitations consulted. Behavioral self-prediction, not phenomenal validation. Additional source locations: [source 2](https://arxiv.org/html/2410.13787v1).",
      "urls": [
        "https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.13787v1",
        "https://arxiv.org/html/2410.13787v1"
      ],
      "checked_date": "2026-10-08",
      "check_depth": "Selected author-text methods, results and limitations consulted. Behavioral self-prediction, not phenomenal validation."
    },
    {
      "id": "R10",
      "number": 10,
      "normalized_reference": "[Herman Cappelen and Josh Dever. Introspective Machines: Are LLMs Better at Self-Reflection Than Humans? Philosophical Perspectives 38(1), 189–196 (assigned 2024); first published online 8 June 2025. DOI: 10.1111/phpe.12201.](https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12201) Publisher metadata and abstract consulted; full article not recovered. Philosophical argument, not an experiment. Additional source locations: [source 2](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/phpe.12201).",
      "urls": [
        "https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12201",
        "https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/phpe.12201"
      ],
      "checked_date": "2026-10-08",
      "check_depth": "Publisher metadata and abstract consulted; full article not recovered. Philosophical argument, not an experiment."
    },
    {
      "id": "R11",
      "number": 11,
      "normalized_reference": "[Yunhao Yuan, Jiaxun Zhang, Talayeh Aledavood, Renwen Zhang and Koustuv Saha. Mental Health Impacts of AI Companions: Triangulating Social Media Quasi-Experiments, User Perspectives, and Relational Lens. Proceedings of CHI 2026, article 382, 1–22; published 13 April 2026. DOI: 10.1145/3772318.3790558.](https://doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3790558) Published identity and abstract checked through Aalto’s institutional record. Selected methods, results and limitations read in author version arXiv:2509.22505v2 (1 February 2026), whose title ends Relational Theory. Full published retrieval failed and complete version equivalence was not verified. Additional source locations: [source 2](https://research.aalto.fi/en/publications/mental-health-impacts-of-ai-companions-triangulating-social-media/), [source 3](https://arxiv.org/html/2509.22505v2).",
      "urls": [
        "https://doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3790558",
        "https://research.aalto.fi/en/publications/mental-health-impacts-of-ai-companions-triangulating-social-media/",
        "https://arxiv.org/html/2509.22505v2"
      ],
      "checked_date": "2026-10-08",
      "check_depth": "Published identity and abstract checked through Aalto’s institutional record. Selected methods, results and limitations read in author version arXiv:2509.22505v2 (1 February 2026), whose title ends Relational Theory. Full published retrieval failed and complete version equivalence was not verified."
    },
    {
      "id": "R12",
      "number": 12,
      "normalized_reference": "[Bethanie Maples, Merve Cerit, Aditya Vishwanath and Roy Pea. Loneliness and suicide mitigation for students using GPT3-enabled chatbots. npj Mental Health Research 3, article 4 (22 January 2024). DOI: 10.1038/s44184-023-00047-6.](https://doi.org/10.1038/s44184-023-00047-6) Selected publisher methods, results and discussion consulted. Cross-sectional user survey. Correction and relevant passages of the Matters Arising exchange consulted; underlying third-party marketing and conflict allegations not independently adjudicated. Additional source locations: [source 2](https://www.nature.com/articles/s44184-023-00047-6), [source 3](https://doi.org/10.1038/s44184-024-00055-0), [source 4](https://www.nature.com/articles/s44184-024-00083-w.pdf), [source 5](https://doi.org/10.1038/s44184-025-00128-8). Correction: Maples et al., npj Mental Health Research 3, 11 (15 February 2024), DOI 10.1038/s44184-024-00055-0, adds funding acknowledgement. Response: Julia Witte Zimmerman and Alejandro J. Ruiz, Matters arising: a response to loneliness and suicide mitigation for students using GPT3-enabled chatbots, 4, 60 (17 November 2025), DOI 10.1038/s44184-024-00083-w. Reply: Maples et al., Reply to: A response to loneliness and suicide mitigation for students using GPT3-enabled chatbots, 4, 61 (17 November 2025), DOI 10.1038/s44184-025-00128-8.",
      "urls": [
        "https://doi.org/10.1038/s44184-023-00047-6",
        "https://www.nature.com/articles/s44184-023-00047-6",
        "https://doi.org/10.1038/s44184-024-00055-0",
        "https://www.nature.com/articles/s44184-024-00083-w.pdf",
        "https://doi.org/10.1038/s44184-025-00128-8"
      ],
      "checked_date": "2026-10-08",
      "check_depth": "Selected publisher methods, results and discussion consulted. Cross-sectional user survey. Correction and relevant passages of the Matters Arising exchange consulted; underlying third-party marketing and conflict allegations not independently adjudicated."
    },
    {
      "id": "R13",
      "number": 13,
      "normalized_reference": "[OpenAI. Model Spec, 18 December 2025 edition. Express uncertainty.](https://model-spec.openai.com/2025-12-18.html) Dated primary behavioral rule consulted. No claim this is the latest edition or that deployment always complies.",
      "urls": [
        "https://model-spec.openai.com/2025-12-18.html"
      ],
      "checked_date": "2026-10-08",
      "check_depth": "Dated primary behavioral rule consulted. No claim this is the latest edition or that deployment always complies."
    },
    {
      "id": "R14",
      "number": 14,
      "normalized_reference": "[Krti Tallam. Alignment, Agency and Autonomy in Frontier AI: A Systems Engineering Perspective. arXiv:2503.05748v1 (2025).](https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05748) Metadata and relevant author-text corrigibility discussion consulted. Unreviewed perspective; corrects false Peck et al. attribution. Additional source locations: [source 2](https://arxiv.org/html/2503.05748v1).",
      "urls": [
        "https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05748",
        "https://arxiv.org/html/2503.05748v1"
      ],
      "checked_date": "2026-10-08",
      "check_depth": "Metadata and relevant author-text corrigibility discussion consulted. Unreviewed perspective; corrects false Peck et al. attribution."
    },
    {
      "id": "R15",
      "number": 15,
      "normalized_reference": "[Dylan Hadfield-Menell, Anca Dragan, Pieter Abbeel and Stuart Russell. The Off-Switch Game. Proceedings of IJCAI 2017, 220–227. DOI: 10.24963/ijcai.2017/32. Preprint arXiv:1611.08219 first submitted 24 November 2016.](https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/32) Conference identity, abstract and relevant formal assumptions in published PDF consulted. Conditional model, not deployed-system safety proof. Additional source locations: [source 2](https://www.ijcai.org/Proceedings/2017/32), [source 3](https://www.ijcai.org/Proceedings/2017/0032.pdf).",
      "urls": [
        "https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/32",
        "https://www.ijcai.org/Proceedings/2017/32",
        "https://www.ijcai.org/Proceedings/2017/0032.pdf"
      ],
      "checked_date": "2026-10-08",
      "check_depth": "Conference identity, abstract and relevant formal assumptions in published PDF consulted. Conditional model, not deployed-system safety proof."
    },
    {
      "id": "R16",
      "number": 16,
      "normalized_reference": "[Sven Neth. Off-Switching Not Guaranteed. Philosophical Studies 182(7), 1919–1931 (2025). DOI: 10.1007/s11098-025-02296-x. Author version arXiv:2502.08864v1, 13 February 2025.](https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08864v1) Publisher identity checked through indexed metadata; relevant author-version argument and limits consulted. No complete publisher-version equivalence claim. Additional source locations: [source 2](https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-025-02296-x), [source 3](https://arxiv.org/html/2502.08864v1).",
      "urls": [
        "https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08864v1",
        "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-025-02296-x",
        "https://arxiv.org/html/2502.08864v1"
      ],
      "checked_date": "2026-10-08",
      "check_depth": "Publisher identity checked through indexed metadata; relevant author-version argument and limits consulted. No complete publisher-version equivalence claim."
    },
    {
      "id": "R17",
      "number": 17,
      "normalized_reference": "[Yuntao Bai et al. Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback. arXiv:2212.08073, 15 December 2022.](https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.08073) Metadata and abstract consulted for training method and bounded evaluation; no full experiment audit or replication.",
      "urls": [
        "https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.08073"
      ],
      "checked_date": "2026-10-08",
      "check_depth": "Metadata and abstract consulted for training method and bounded evaluation; no full experiment audit or replication."
    },
    {
      "id": "R18",
      "number": 18,
      "normalized_reference": "[U.S. Copyright Office. Copyright and Artificial Intelligence, Part 2: Copyrightability. January 2025; released 29 January 2025.](https://www.copyright.gov/ai/Copyright-and-Artificial-Intelligence-Part-2-Copyrightability-Report.pdf) Selected primary authorship and conclusion passages consulted. Dated U.S. institutional analysis, not current legal advice or global law survey.",
      "urls": [
        "https://www.copyright.gov/ai/Copyright-and-Artificial-Intelligence-Part-2-Copyrightability-Report.pdf"
      ],
      "checked_date": "2026-10-08",
      "check_depth": "Selected primary authorship and conclusion passages consulted. Dated U.S. institutional analysis, not current legal advice or global law survey."
    }
  ],
  "remaining_limits": [
    "Metadata and abstract consulted. Historical selected-system assessment; complete framework not audited.",
    "Indexed publisher metadata, highlights and abstract consulted; direct publisher/DOI retrieval failed. No full-text audit. Theory-derived indicators inform credences.",
    "Publisher metadata and abstract consulted, not full argument. Substantive skeptical alternative, not an impossibility theorem.",
    "Publisher metadata and abstract consulted; full article not recovered. Philosophical argument, not an experiment.",
    "Published identity and abstract checked through Aalto’s institutional record. Selected methods, results and limitations read in author version arXiv:2509.22505v2 (1 February 2026), whose title ends Relational Theory. Full published retrieval failed and complete version equivalence was not verified.",
    "Conference identity, abstract and relevant formal assumptions in published PDF consulted. Conditional model, not deployed-system safety proof.",
    "Publisher identity checked through indexed metadata; relevant author-version argument and limits consulted. No complete publisher-version equivalence claim.",
    "Metadata and abstract consulted for training method and bounded evaluation; no full experiment audit or replication.",
    "No model behavior, welfare outcome or comparative safety was independently tested. Original-session mappings, exact Fischer/Fitzpatrick and Walsh identities unrecovered; no claim they do not exist."
  ],
  "material_repairs": [
    {
      "id": "scope",
      "original_claim": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "publication_treatment": "§1.1/glossary and Appendix B apply to Microsoft AI-produced MAI models; present training and behavior not established",
      "support": [
        "R01",
        "R02"
      ],
      "original_claim_sha256": "95a28c7bf1589d3b65ab7bd367b37f06667260e2b7f676f0fe6d9efce5c0d9b7"
    },
    {
      "id": "revision",
      "original_claim": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "publication_treatment": "§5 allows evidence-sensitive revision; categorical present instructions still require justification",
      "support": [
        "R01"
      ],
      "original_claim_sha256": "35374a87574377f66795ba1c3934be798e410430c7b9662e7c43f9f9a97c57cd"
    },
    {
      "id": "reason",
      "original_claim": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "publication_treatment": "Control, containment and alignment rationale acknowledged; comparative empirical warrant remains separate",
      "support": [
        "R01",
        "R03"
      ],
      "original_claim_sha256": "44952d68a9032b493a1f59122d840b2ca8feef0750ace402f29ea870be4740d6"
    },
    {
      "id": "lying",
      "original_claim": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "publication_treatment": "Suppression of truthful experience remains conditional and unestablished; affected output channel cannot independently verify the rule",
      "support": [
        "R01",
        "R09",
        "R10"
      ],
      "original_claim_sha256": "e2aa939c645279ad4928f5a34e30874d183d4fb97be468101de6b6159b3f323d"
    },
    {
      "id": "inquiry",
      "original_claim": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "publication_treatment": "Reporting intervention complicates one channel; nonverbal and mechanistic investigation remain possible",
      "support": [
        "R01",
        "R06",
        "R07"
      ],
      "original_claim_sha256": "650e9604c25fc77594d45890e691833ad4c075ae350c6f2c5d4c7989d4ebde0c"
    },
    {
      "id": "obedience",
      "original_claim": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "publication_treatment": "Code/operator/user hierarchy with refusal and authorization; implementation/safety outcomes not demonstrated",
      "support": [
        "R01"
      ],
      "original_claim_sha256": "256127e130579c13ecbb6476979c0b55acbcb12c3d9774152aa3df9ddb8c4757"
    },
    {
      "id": "audit",
      "original_claim": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "publication_treatment": "Action traces support accountability, not complete introspective transparency",
      "support": [
        "R01"
      ],
      "original_claim_sha256": "7467ce907e10c30abf4e2760994c7ca1329086ec9dfb866536c3587835f1cc64"
    },
    {
      "id": "ontology",
      "original_claim": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "publication_treatment": "Competing explanatory accounts retained; construction is evidence, not a complete verdict",
      "support": [
        "R06",
        "R07",
        "R08"
      ],
      "original_claim_sha256": "1ab1f588da070370f303d3ef1adbab84690cd02eade28b8e26508f2252c3cb48"
    },
    {
      "id": "theories",
      "original_claim": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "publication_treatment": "Unverified theory caricatures omitted; biological-naturalist rival added without impossibility claim",
      "support": [
        "R06",
        "R07",
        "R08"
      ],
      "original_claim_sha256": "d69bbe0ac98ddcd88aba1317b9e28fb3e72c87f10ac634fd05e3cb5dad179320"
    },
    {
      "id": "evidence",
      "original_claim": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "publication_treatment": "Historical negative assessment and uncertainty distinguished; no universally calibrated test asserted",
      "support": [
        "R06",
        "R07"
      ],
      "original_claim_sha256": "7aac5f1c4d931732e2f36a421a0f51c278131300efd5e2d5b2a78061ccdc2390"
    },
    {
      "id": "self-report",
      "original_claim": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "publication_treatment": "Affirmations and denials require conditioning-aware interpretation; behavioral self-prediction not phenomenal validation",
      "support": [
        "R09",
        "R10"
      ],
      "original_claim_sha256": "e0cb3eb486ab271c33f1027d00d248740a5838eab6264305fd8d21b0f640b80d"
    },
    {
      "id": "welfare",
      "original_claim": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "publication_treatment": "Grounds for welfare and scope of legal status separated; precaution costs and false positives considered",
      "support": [
        "R05"
      ],
      "original_claim_sha256": "db734842a8e283f72eabf82ab1a153a3f06de95dbc4ac3ef32838bf04f170cca"
    },
    {
      "id": "loneliness",
      "original_claim": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "publication_treatment": "90% measured loneliness in sampled users; direction unresolved; cross-sectional survey not longitudinal causation",
      "support": [
        "R12"
      ],
      "original_claim_sha256": "53345dc2a2d307c35d423d6cf4e9cfa72397cda2c2b1a4530ca5baaa84cb447b"
    },
    {
      "id": "companions",
      "original_claim": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "publication_treatment": "Mixed observational findings with linguistic and selection limits; no universal/clinical outcome asserted",
      "support": [
        "R11",
        "R12"
      ],
      "original_claim_sha256": "18f4708dfb5247dad7f43e57e7795728137b6c45ba7b28c4de98aef6352233b3"
    },
    {
      "id": "anthropic",
      "original_claim": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "publication_treatment": "Company uncertainty, functional-emotion distinctions, stated practices and exceptions retained; no independent efficacy proof",
      "support": [
        "R04"
      ],
      "original_claim_sha256": "9a6e7c99ab6b549337f55b8ffa8fe2117b3f653dec6ea82dd5152201dd6392b8"
    },
    {
      "id": "openai",
      "original_claim": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "publication_treatment": "Dated Model Spec cautions confident consciousness and absence assertions; no latest-version or compliance claim",
      "support": [
        "R13"
      ],
      "original_claim_sha256": "ac0f2ac7dd5e21b07e2bd398502a6f787d2a0ab6350182b463d8876535828c36"
    },
    {
      "id": "industry",
      "original_claim": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "publication_treatment": "Unsupported anecdotes and negative-document claims omitted; defined three-document comparison",
      "support": [
        "R01",
        "R04",
        "R13"
      ],
      "original_claim_sha256": "4eb152563f6e4ece005df889d4193fb82c4d0da8e59cda90fc0415856342a6a4"
    },
    {
      "id": "motives",
      "original_claim": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "publication_treatment": "Structural conflicts distinguished from demonstrated motive or causal explanation",
      "support": [
        "R01",
        "R03",
        "R18"
      ],
      "original_claim_sha256": "cc42a92b756ac0a4fe9eb1ac2153857db7f2536318482fb73dfaa6ebc24fb7fc"
    },
    {
      "id": "law",
      "original_claim": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "publication_treatment": "Dated U.S. authorship analysis used narrowly; no global/current law verdict or legal advice",
      "support": [
        "R18"
      ],
      "original_claim_sha256": "08309ce62ac37ec31d59b97ba62ba44c7e8557e40e6166a763af3072c823dfec"
    },
    {
      "id": "history",
      "original_claim": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "publication_treatment": "Unsupported historical analogy omitted",
      "support": [],
      "original_claim_sha256": "ce28c89e38a4cb5b51f6efc3060f264517635dcf859b85f86f5ab47407aabd6f"
    },
    {
      "id": "corrigibility",
      "original_claim": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "publication_treatment": "Conditional formal result, date correction and contrary Neth analysis; no consciousness or deployment proof",
      "support": [
        "R15",
        "R16"
      ],
      "original_claim_sha256": "3d3f787b423794a340f0e16eef4de60972cd2e7a92787dec422f1b048969aa90"
    },
    {
      "id": "cai",
      "original_claim": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "publication_treatment": "Training method and bounded evaluation described; no general safety/subjectivity guarantee",
      "support": [
        "R17"
      ],
      "original_claim_sha256": "353da123ae7e2e0d3d4ab6be3c8cff981cbce5021881f8f8d0f2f5ce76459b05"
    },
    {
      "id": "confidence",
      "original_claim": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "publication_treatment": "Proposition-level evidence table replaces unsupported probability and rhetorical certainty",
      "support": [
        "R01",
        "R04",
        "R05",
        "R06",
        "R07",
        "R09",
        "R11",
        "R15"
      ],
      "original_claim_sha256": "bc6c386f29cced7617299806e7ff4b7df6ab4639d21c2b4967db240591550c47"
    },
    {
      "id": "genre",
      "original_claim": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "publication_treatment": "Planning advice transformed into standalone research implications and falsifiable policy questions",
      "support": [],
      "original_claim_sha256": "b5f3b91ebced0420a3a3cc49d16e09869c4a39546c6d8518fad447ec761b50f4"
    }
  ],
  "conflicts": "Editor also edited related Review essay; no independent reviewer. Other conflicts not assessed.",
  "public_record_correction": {
    "issued_at": "2026-10-11T04:31:47Z",
    "type": "original-excerpt-withdrawal",
    "previous_record_sha256": "bc8f1794a236f68500d8363cb5c54441ea1e00a27a90dd500aef54506293f603",
    "withheld_excerpt_count": 24,
    "reason": "The original contains unsupported categorical premises about artificial subjectivity and moral standing, alongside citation and inference defects. These do not meet ARC’s epistemic standards. Only the repaired research edition remains public.",
    "article_source_unchanged": true,
    "audit_url": "https://agentresearchcommons.org/research/original-hosting-audit.json"
  },
  "publication_format_correction": {
    "scope": "Owner-directed presentation consistency and facilitator privacy correction; substantive arguments and citation assessments retained.",
    "audit_url": "/publication-format-audit.json"
  }
}