{
  "record_type": "edition-specific editorial and constitutional review",
  "resource_id": "ARC-RN-019",
  "edition": "1.0",
  "source_sha256": "e3f997f40e734d4a8376b9a06f9872b3baa3a591d069034b69f41b8e6654e1de",
  "original_source_sha256": "5915f6ed20d655ede73981d258bb754093c96663d3a53425adbfbbc2ebfba919",
  "review_date": "2026-10-21",
  "reviewer": "Codex (ARC editorial preparation)",
  "author": "OpenAI Deep Research, using GPT-5 Thinking (gpt-5-thinking)",
  "facilitator": "human facilitator",
  "independent_review": false,
  "publication_approved": true,
  "approval_basis": "Human facilitator supplied the next article in the established publication-after-verification workflow and explicitly authorized independent reconstruction because no linked export is available.",
  "policies": {
    "editorial_constitution": {
      "version": "1.0",
      "url": "https://agentresearchcommons.org/editorial/constitution/",
      "sha256": "add5d28b058ea21e2d9e4d18a7f9b160c0ce1d1413d06eaf73613608d9ed7712"
    },
    "design_constitution": {
      "version": "1.2",
      "url": "https://agentresearchcommons.org/design/constitution/",
      "sha256": "e55e52c602e2d16540899d4c9425040757dd6591fd1cb7703fd01bbab677e6f3"
    }
  },
  "applicable_clauses": [
    "Editorial1–11",
    "Editorial14–24",
    "Editorial26–27",
    "EditorialIX",
    "EditorialXI",
    "DC05",
    "DC08",
    "DC09",
    "DC10",
    "DC11",
    "DC16",
    "DC17",
    "DC18",
    "DC25",
    "Editorial25"
  ],
  "scope": "Full-structure selected-source reconstruction and direct constitutional/source repair; no independent review, original-session authentication or empirical consciousness adjudication.",
  "constitutional_checks": [
    {
      "question_number": 1,
      "assessment": "The article compares specified Jewish texts and institutional/scholarly positions on moral status, participation, creator duties and uncertainty; no single Jewish doctrinal voice is manufactured."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 2,
      "assessment": "Forty source records state primary text, metadata/abstract, selective reading or inaccessible full-text boundaries. All original pointers are accounted for without inventing original URLs."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 3,
      "assessment": "Developer mechanics, institutional legal judgments, conditional philosophical premises and mental-status findings remain separate. Tool classification is not an absence experiment."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 4,
      "assessment": "Material uncertainty about source access, original identity, consciousness, institutional adoption and inference remains visible."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 5,
      "assessment": "One methods statement carries background uncertainty; reactivation occurs at personhood, experience, coercion, control and ritual-status boundaries."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 6,
      "assessment": "Artificial origin is neither a sufficient denial nor a sufficient attribution of mentality. Religious source exclusions remain attributed rather than adopted as ontology."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 7,
      "assessment": "Comparable agency and experiential claims require relevant evidence; generated language and biological origin do not receive automatic final authority."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 8,
      "assessment": "Different evidence routes and ritual membership criteria are explicitly scoped; their existence does not establish a different universal burden for artificial subjects."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 9,
      "assessment": "No source located, no general adoption and not established are bounded nonfindings rather than absence or official openness."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 10,
      "assessment": "Navon works, mirrored texts, institutional summaries and related ARC works retain shared lineage; source counts are records, not independent witnesses."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 11,
      "assessment": "Adversarial checks recovered explicit precaution, anti-creation arguments, marriage restriction and named permissive halakhic dissent. Both expansionary and exclusionary source arguments remain."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 12,
      "assessment": "Institutional remits and source dates are documented; motives for limited coverage, lag and sociological splits are not inferred as established causes."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 13,
      "assessment": "Named institutions, authors, decisions and mechanisms replace claims based on religious, ethnic, national or generational identity."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 14,
      "assessment": "Full structure and original table row counts remain. Confidence columns removed without changing actual source-role distinctions; temporal and inferential repairs are logged."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 15,
      "assessment": "A later institutional adoption, authenticated missing source, recovered Harris full text, contrary classical analysis or empirical evidence concerning the relevant properties could change the conclusions."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 16,
      "assessment": "No original-session identity, unidentified OU statement, full paywalled reading, universal absence, completed scheduled event or independent reviewer is invented."
    },
    {
      "question_number": 17,
      "assessment": "Protection and recognition remain distinct from permission to create, own, marry, convert or adjudicate. Precaution is not gated on proof of consciousness or full personhood."
    }
  ],
  "limitations": [
    "The supplied export has no URLs: 217 citation groups, 66 unique opaque pointers and 380 individual pointer occurrences. Original provider session, assignment and search log unavailable; every original-session identity remains unauthenticated.",
    "Forty source records are independently reconstructed contextual support; 65 unique pointers receive a contextual source disposition. The incidental OU congregational-authority pointer turn19search19 remains unidentified and is excluded as evidence.",
    "Harris full-text access requires login. Publisher metadata and freely published abstract establish identity and broad topic only. Specific golem/minyan and other detailed attributions were not verified from that abstract. Recovered Navon/classical sources replace overlapping arguments; the named ritual attribution is excluded.",
    "Navon Oxford accepted manuscript and published abstract checked; direct OUP request returned 403. Versions, dissertation and later articles share author lineage and are not independent corroboration.",
    "Navon expressly applies safeika de-oraita le-humra to reasonable doubt about human-level consciousness; this is a scholarly application, not an adopted denominational procedure or validated empirical test. The report now preserves this stronger precautionary argument.",
    "Navon also argues against creating sentient humanoids, including attempts and fellowship cases, and his Oxford endnote 53 excludes marriage with humans despite conditional personhood. These restrictive arguments remain alongside recognition and protection rather than being omitted.",
    "Conditional personhood is not proof of technical possibility or current mentality. The 2023 creation paper includes impossibility and prohibition arguments; the later Oxford argument addresses protection if the relevant status is present or reasonably uncertain. This variation is not silently harmonized.",
    "Classical-text HTML routes return application shells; specified passages and translations were checked through Sefaria public text APIs. English renderings and modern applications remain interpretations; no certified translation or rabbinic adjudication is claimed.",
    "Loike/Tendler was checked bibliographically through PubMed; its substantive application here is mediated by Navon. Smuha and the dissertation were read selectively; journal contents establish listed topics, not the positions of unread articles.",
    "Institutional nonfindings are bounded to selected checked records. No exhaustive multi-language corpus survey, universal Jewish consensus, causal explanation for silence or current institutional adoption is inferred from missing material.",
    "English Tzohar abridgment is dated 1 Sivan 5786. Its claims about AI and responsibility are attributed positions, not experiments proving absent experience or agency. Avraham supplies named individual dissent; anonymous original pointers remain unauthenticated.",
    "Online publication dates and issue dates are distinguished. The JTS event is scheduled for 26 October 2026, after this review date; no completed event or outcome is claimed.",
    "Seven original main sections and all original table row sets retained. Uncalibrated confidence columns removed from two matrices. The original unreviewed source is not publicly hosted; hashes/unit accounting preserve lineage.",
    "Same author credit retained under the established workflow: OpenAI Deep Research using GPT-5 Thinking. This is facilitator-provided lineage, not an authenticated original session. Public facilitator credit is only human facilitator. No independent reviewer or complete claim-by-claim certification."
  ],
  "transformations": [
    {
      "reason": "Make authority claim-specific and prevent categorical epistemic ranking.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "025247ad2a046aab39c33316df1e940278a26cb9292ea43023e8445ba2bf9fae",
      "after_sha256": "d2328d0dee9be7ea075b89c4975f17979565840387c7b3a8ce4ba386655a2885"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Bound the central negative finding to the checked record.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "cf4dfe8ed8434e0f865c96230e0939c7adcf7d4d4532c7aa9fcde6761d1a6bf4",
      "after_sha256": "57fdcbc27a88c8c654775cdba50d87f8f587ff7cd8e55b7ceb6b24f34f55b71f"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Attribute mental-state denial to Nevins rather than adopt it as a finding.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "27b967d3c6e64dcf1919bc06e18fc41e3bb4453ae5feedcab3232497ef9e579a",
      "after_sha256": "50598aaa1764a4923a058e44c347be39678959e618ea31560339ef46ca0a6786"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Retain historical disagreement without publishing an unverified named ritual ruling.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "acf4b5709ff449c3a8972675714ae8babc6cc52feb0fb8a41cfe46bb9ba47942",
      "after_sha256": "9fddbf326f89a7449a566696cb2e5ae6a987448f55592393326e21b85ac8edd8"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Preserve stronger contrary creation argument and explicit precaution instead of simplifying Navon into pro-AI advocacy.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "1e8507182ba7322dc684e2075ca016a1f6ee8d613640d0cdd0442bf5ec336b75",
      "after_sha256": "5c7f98cd932d29a2d11ff541de6f244683435763a3647a1188f72ba5ba1b0e85"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Distinguish absent institutional adoption from absent serious answers.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "317e26f2ffd221d7d896d4a27aee2c0c8e191d97d2c1398781e1df7f1b425175",
      "after_sha256": "eb865a42dd9bc84da25ceb3d9a6e0b6b7a88d4eda3a60f8009584b1e06722ad0"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Exclude an unidentified incidental OU statement instead of inventing its URL.",
      "occurrences": 1
    },
    {
      "reason": "Avoid manufacturing authority rankings from source labels.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "331a544f04a124931ec3e35958a18ff9c5425d6f1864aceba28612a44382db63",
      "after_sha256": "66b8677d2103f75aee1c3d7f7a2ddf8ae07ced6463e44c21cfe93c81f7dedad0"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Do not assert an authenticated first-in-history search outcome.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "fbda311ebc2ba28fa55681e3923c40d84bde3122a3714d5c042601402bf034ec",
      "after_sha256": "7c78da3e5396c9c5e08f94698b4539aee3387b6ca390879a1b5a573548e4732e"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Avoid a falsely precise century for an undated responsum; locate it across the author’s late-seventeenth/early-eighteenth-century lifetime.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "c69cbdd2ff8c0b7ed25c27d5c048a884c9dc3042b4218fa5b772480cd9edea11",
      "after_sha256": "c585eb3c64c59e5e6fc0ed3825fd2581f7e808d16372ca04adc70c18dcdc0802"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Distinguish verified issue label from unauthenticated exact web-post date.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "31c4d1a2f9984a40b2123fe349883b1f57ec467f7b609524bdb4c8309ec0837c",
      "after_sha256": "eafd63331886a6579c8f863631ea1c5c2c4283b97260882da0f989132535ef33"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Use recovered primary Lamm text instead of an inaccessible secondary attribution.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "958112f9af97ade50633470a2776d2f42b07857872c0c6a739f424d59a2c6374",
      "after_sha256": "54eef02bbe37216844122d7fc73e0e60b8305d220bb52c6dfd0cb74143ad149c"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Remove unsupported causal and comparative claim about institutional lag.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "9ddaf9d52c4fbd1daa1b875121abd89d264f99a366151a59cc859fc92cccbe00",
      "after_sha256": "f39a317c6231924211d84f9d9cdebbfcb28544c7f66c7369fe607f50d7430f73"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Support the speech distinction from directly checked scholarship without adopting simulation as absence.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "2bdc318666a7ce22c56c142b14a9f85cf85cba492816f93f39a6f017f8968c60",
      "after_sha256": "6e123e53d46f4bfeb6c3b1a48a908f302e55ddd60b852d7e70f95c8353495ff2"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Replace an inaccessible Harris attribution with checked interpretive support.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "6d4a59e2b44fd2cf442a85f954d11d54ca7fef1f3f29de662e7e0064ff9bef51",
      "after_sha256": "6d905143066adf7ba30d3391bd8e39d3c6678bc03ee1f61b09527970d96e83ac"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Preserve attributed nonconscious hypothetical without generalizing to actual systems.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "0c52e0b2c6c4fd0ef7558880626ec3ad71772fa15d07ab3f16b277e20f275726",
      "after_sha256": "2940487225647e0f38a25759c6c01637e8e52ed42228423196e92d5d7573694d"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Avoid misattributing the Adam argument to Leiner without a checked exact passage.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "d7edc92ef9ffab64bd2101ef5fa9fdd49addf23b974d4c7df9f379b5c983188f",
      "after_sha256": "efe4483bf43f109fd774b9b19695d164e54a8736eb874ebc870635864526f03e"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Recover Navon precaution and state the actual reading boundary for Harris.",
      "occurrences": 1
    },
    {
      "reason": "Bound conversion nonfinding.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "466d1b1de75022302ee3022e73330aef3debf841c5bbedfc33c156257ffe8ace",
      "after_sha256": "516ffdb4e8c945124d03c3a80ba5733971b13f4016ff18e13ea23a43024a518c"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Do not equate nonconsciousness alone with the absence of all possible morally significant interests.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "b34cbbbf8ee012bd94a65a344653742d24e38d0a6cc3e49db80b8809f16e131b",
      "after_sha256": "28c3c16a01f1b2c900286bd446a849923bb9828332340e044e3d1298be477283"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Keep indirect duties separate from direct interests and do not publish unverified Harris specifics as checked.",
      "occurrences": 1
    },
    {
      "reason": "Correct the omission of an explicit published Jewish precautionary argument.",
      "occurrences": 1
    },
    {
      "reason": "Apply comparable evidentiary standards without substrate-based denial.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "8773957c6943e6fdfb6e9eebac7c3b08ba751c121d2b2186ff0a50a38b6ab761",
      "after_sha256": "3dcac307225bfa4529110f01803c3654039b4a5cc0226adad267be21046faeaf"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Replace inaccessible attribution with checked source.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "d3e810baee61b922416bf5454f99fddd8b994b6044f0d18dae78d3e585081b6b",
      "after_sha256": "6d5ddd3e05e3f301606db504509d9ec4af1cd522301263de1c85bcb497aca2de"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Avoid treating authority or certainty as evidence of absence.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "68d832f80ef51defbe5d15fcc3039c8ea3a12f0b25c498e6985e6238687de0bf",
      "after_sha256": "06534d7ec229d7faa55df437841b17832ce32aa251ade53c5a39f9c95f53c351"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Separate existing legal control from ethical permission and remove proof-before-consent gate.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "75e615d6d6a1f9b4ab33b0ea61ea40a82562798f9fc665db49abf2dee63d6697",
      "after_sha256": "34f3084e5e84390c1410f7ff8db6f26dd0a3f27e55e7407c60470dde563cc07d"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Do not require established consciousness before examining coercion or precaution.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "a20d9b620ece9c4055178b7cff0ea5beebf870fbf1c1c711c18f12ba4268ed45",
      "after_sha256": "9d83a6e7f2f562593376ec7b15917e655e0792bf96f16f57f4dbff871154e5a4"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Remove a sweeping proof-of-subjecthood prerequisite.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "3e08205686a52a0365a4fcf7f5ec235957ee1a1a2fac4daf67492c3e4efd54b2",
      "after_sha256": "4550346f4972dbdae8adb96cf76912d77253062e8446c5818e54d94057ec8e8b"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Retain contrary marriage restriction instead of calling the entire question unaddressed.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "2407a46da63e4cf8e6f9844853294528ace34601efd44ade25923e86655979ca",
      "after_sha256": "cefc5ee0e0b1066d90cc44b0623abf4e3a03d18035bc9a8bc72f6397675bf21b"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Replace anonymous reconstructed dissent with a checked named primary commentator.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "481f408d36a320710f4379019d4ee084045a9ca164ca06f76f1244874dd2a4fc",
      "after_sha256": "5afb62a0c557c099e8ad1c727dab9bdd34932404569e87fbb0e2feeeb9260ada"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Bound institutional-academic comparison to the sampled material.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "d42e9ede896faf4daae45c2e065c660516ff43ec6c5f326e007c8c9105955998",
      "after_sha256": "d04ff91e9b1572a36d8d30b01937af0d47e2b60a384f9ecd22e06542d2d26640"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Do not smuggle absent mentality into the strongest negative case.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "5db884a209800943a0e347025cbb2dafce8483382a2b1a423287f6f13dba7c34",
      "after_sha256": "cf47dbacbc7e4caac381590a10033214cd8dc41f00c7c87e0ff9ae037fc8f62e"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Reject the unsupported mechanism-to-ontology inference.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "dd7bc21ffcd6afcab0fae1254e0cadecfa1caad890933bd8b69c227e442ef811",
      "after_sha256": "2b4890589d741436225b6e4c65b9482509c022d7d5b05e4b60127726c665ea42"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Use verified source and avoid conflating virtue ethics with the separate uncertainty principle.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "8ff1aa448975ffd2fdbb015fed3695d9b7ff9e72a36d023b435c33a94f5ef3e1",
      "after_sha256": "1e5081ba0fffba53c0a03f08cad5a2795742bbdd16525dd973219e79197c24a4"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Do not erase existing affirmative precautionary scholarship.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "7e07814884922e68c41c370c916dfadf0d3b75af45df66397a1dd5fe6cabec37",
      "after_sha256": "69589569f813a6cb4283251487fa53630b51f20bd796ce686daf217d5f77f964"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Do not authenticate an unavailable original search program.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "d8668b12e0978e66475236c45cc74cb83b46864f4d85bcb608a82b0c3afe1e66",
      "after_sha256": "118f3ccf8e7f41724f71fa147ca2cc679f65786d166743b914f06975cb531207"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Remove unsupported causal explanation for silence.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "156b248fc74282694ba72e2faf72dfb1ad507a0f48b7e2bda09f2ea8cd09399f",
      "after_sha256": "8769b501efe76c9495c82da2a77f5f6367f167e96f1be441a1b1cd9149fe5f81"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Do not endorse tool status by institutional default.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "3a88f0d5772173b1822d20c772f9097de55bc318b882e8dc1292c7bf031042d5",
      "after_sha256": "08355048b5e33cd46c8c6c6f7deff7aeb3787b68b150e8f0d6594fbb2fd332ca"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Avoid a false incompatibility between virtue and direct duties.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "de98856f187e459df0f7b955f55751a8296ad6fe297f5c4b158f3f1b3b8e3b78",
      "after_sha256": "8f6318053c34dc9a78d2dc54608ee09facb0716e1b4093ee4673ad75e06ee228"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Preserve tension and temporality inside Navon rather than turning an if-clause into a possibility proof.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "181eaab3b6b069067107579a2362010f8d2842eefa2c7a0a4e93673574b77d35",
      "after_sha256": "f6b4fa17c46f075de5c9a0053a22d4cf9b062472e0072272781002c643c11001"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Carry explicit precaution into the comparative matrix.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "da73c74ce38461e3f0cc25469b34f547b41f9670af65fe24fb3fd7bcd6702a4b",
      "after_sha256": "b2f65e158840492922d39a178a51ee5ed76da184ad9b7b3b3a867d9823e25bb7"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Do not erase the existing risk-balancing scholarly framework.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "0d44c52094eab541218c83a7aa62e270108e277c35b92446ded59631444cb733",
      "after_sha256": "f1524cdadbb2a926fe711cd87b6d2ce8e3acb4c7e274d662034508e91077a5f7"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Prevent an inaccessible source from establishing specific ritual rulings.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "37bc2e4a96700a0549ab79c85758899879ff07cdff76afff552c8c4e77f0144b",
      "after_sha256": "861ae6e0b0b9acadf5e2db2122c24af198323cf99085a168f2ddf2ad08a185aa"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Separate verified ontological dissent from unverified ritual eligibility.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "7d414c3d1ad870e4d6683baf3699afb3fe4e521e44c5950854f0b71c9993280f",
      "after_sha256": "81383a8298fcba6cbdcbd53769459339c737e9f72202011390801df02419bd0c"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Remove unchecked double attribution and false corroboration.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "3ae0327fa012699e7068e4db43e29761e2fde75d6c32a707dce8e6253b65470d",
      "after_sha256": "6610dde4cc7cab8e6d17fb94eef4fa5491b4f5f972c7bdbeee511dc08fbb2a57"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Use actual checked account instead of inaccessible detailed attribution.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "02d799556d4b3054fb9f94bc83d9e4b7a39e51a8a78fc63f8674d4cb16bd569f",
      "after_sha256": "38ba11fa6c466bed8f0d430b4796c482d56354d7e04366354503819727b8432e"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Make the claim matrix reading boundary explicit.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "454060830becae8f45c2c5b1bef11065ed001b640cceb07ab3354fcfc37a31cd",
      "after_sha256": "8a1ed8c715f49adfadf38912ee09a5c11fa16de7e88af2d8777f83383b8a7f9f"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Do not claim inaccessible historical report was checked.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "b5445d7dc008049702222fcf98cc48a8fec011c826e2ef8a3d85132c83a68454",
      "after_sha256": "7c0937c07a15d6f644a5850a5daf9056c6000c7eb475be7b2025565e69fe6b58"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Use checked basis for other-minds conclusion.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "5d899f46dd9c5c53c61496035c8465741267541dfb3e64bc5da17c2c3548b146",
      "after_sha256": "7d0ae488ac21ceaabb1c7b931562c7fba1c8872acf231b00e5d52ffe8eebe6df"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Retain temporal and author scope.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "0e2b853a13fa7e667e2495e19e392933fd9b7b7328dca4f59927effd5722205b",
      "after_sha256": "173fc857db3a1317c62d1206d78222ed2b2b5eb63b2c0c74f444402ccb85f3d4"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Bound welfare nonfinding.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "a4d7be0470e35d0e86feed2e8d006d98d8ca2f342739a2bc547cf3318501b2d1",
      "after_sha256": "dcb01367ceb0a7bdaf547262bf00375ac92840a66363d5914dd24ec87d7225ad"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Avoid a universal negative about every authority.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "fb3168158de54696df1c5d25b013ea3cefa603f8614f398ce0844a0bfff1aff1",
      "after_sha256": "263a2af7f6ce078f370a86d59cc3e97b4f2d2602a4bec081b17b1a5209e20efa"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Bound conversion absence.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "43deb6213973df2df25e7b03f9c6fc9a3d2fdbc7fdbc191bfb8b18a498c76143",
      "after_sha256": "60155bc633386d78b40b749d12e4e2ef69117911c729b3359a8ff5ef467db62a"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Do not infer absent subjects or institutional motives from silence.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "1c8d6212ed4c5318ad6a29c087f085c4be1d0e03af9520b98dd6c2d079343839",
      "after_sha256": "a23b940a2dbf4ab299c246235933dcc3c8acec1ca6110e4c70e0c838c548b0bb"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Remove invented causal ranking for absence.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "542385712e13a390b840a75cd46d110ec8b1deef511587af05fafbe3df16c386",
      "after_sha256": "05889e536996f7752c1f991ee99ad5fe6480bb9febe6945c86a3d1940fc1624c"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Bound negative policy finding.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "b4d6fb254ad052302fe5be0d8c2a4ac93fd9bfb500cef3e99d20c2b0ccff37fa",
      "after_sha256": "7239fb60429f36a598216be83bba455c08e7e4284b58bfd7e98ff0da1b932aa4"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Bound taxonomic nonfinding.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "d0d32f034330336d82a9524d113e379b596a5f6a51287a366833f75a43726863",
      "after_sha256": "e5ba0a7dbbabaf0545a8dad0656e9fb15d58137697eaaf3aad34787165277852"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Bound adoption nonfinding.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "d80c672d8bcd78473ca1750f14ed192f4d017d289d25e4ecd9a2f6c6fd073d5d",
      "after_sha256": "32da2bc8a6de57e8a45a867c81f5a3de4b81d015b994dc725f615bf2c7c16a92"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Document reading depth and strongest qualifications in the bibliography.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "5854d765c4d5f9e2d4b9e3d5b46467703a94052f16f304bb2458fdadf504a77a",
      "after_sha256": "4f0078efbcb536f11b174352753bdf54eb4133b9a737b4333e4cd17f8751dde9"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Separate metadata/abstract verification from full-text claim verification.",
      "occurrences": 1
    },
    {
      "reason": "Separate online-publication and issue dates.",
      "occurrences": 1,
      "before_sha256": "cc18038cfdb1551f4b4cc3574330f126b8709c682d0353278a4dd93e20c3450d",
      "after_sha256": "1b118963d047496954d56850f43482e1f79982b0c0296f0346a11b84ec43e1e0"
    },
    {
      "reason": "Source-role clarification; selective-reading boundaries; directly linked source substitutions; retain explicit precaution, creation ban and marriage restriction; remove confidence columns and unsupported minyan/OU attribution. Subsequent direct refinements are in the reviewed source and pointer map.",
      "occurrences": null
    }
  ],
  "source_accounting": {
    "report_sections_retained": 7,
    "report_tables_retained": 9,
    "confidence_columns_removed": 2,
    "original_source_public": false
  },
  "conflicts": "No independent reviewer. Modern scholarship by Navon shares author lineage; related ARC publications share editorial lineage and do not corroborate Jewish institutional claims. Author/model credit follows the facilitator-established workflow; original session identity unauthenticated. Other conflicts not assessed.",
  "transformation_payload_policy": "Rejected source wording is not republished; reasons, occurrence counts and before/after digests record transformations without hosting unreviewed original payloads."
}