{
  "resource_id": "ARC-RN-003",
  "edition": "1.4",
  "date": "2026-10-04",
  "responsible_role": "ARC agent-assisted editorial review under owner direction; no independent reviewer",
  "policy_versions": {
    "editorial_epistemic": "1.0",
    "design": "1.1"
  },
  "review_scope": "Complete957-line earlier dossier, portal/brief,26-claim21-source ledger and marker map, public support protocol,632-line reader outputs and scores. Selected primary metadata/abstracts and accessible result passages checked, including NoLiMa, RECOMP authors and position-agnostic counterevidence. No full numerical/quotation audit or experiment rerun.",
  "findings": [
    {
      "id": "RN003-C01",
      "clauses": [
        "EEC1",
        "EEC4",
        "EEC10",
        "EEC17"
      ],
      "before": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "issue": "Selected undocumented search cannot establish universal absence or novelty.",
      "repair": "Bound conclusions and gaps to selected corpus; distinguish non-identification from nonexistence.",
      "before_sha256": "aaa32e4e731f8fc517c62eb18880d753eb1c47fc3c427f19f55ae49ba2f57ded"
    },
    {
      "id": "RN003-C02",
      "clauses": [
        "EEC5",
        "EEC6",
        "EEC12"
      ],
      "before": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "issue": "Distinct studies, contexts or vendors do not establish independent evidentiary lineages or exact replications.",
      "repair": "Use cross-study reports; disclose shared benchmarks/models and correlated errors; require justified nested sampling.",
      "before_sha256": "daa5bd8317e82f8869885bfde97aef63373429bbf3474e76927ecd8ea9a4c592"
    },
    {
      "id": "RN003-C03",
      "clauses": [
        "EEC1",
        "EEC2",
        "EEC13"
      ],
      "before": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "issue": "Cross-model differences confound training/tokenization/size; causal capability mechanism was not isolated.",
      "repair": "Report tested rendering effects; treat capability explanation as consistent hypothesis.",
      "before_sha256": "a10ebeb20a863ee0f2b44f0419e9449dfe154bff16b95b5c36b665b488541722"
    },
    {
      "id": "RN003-C04",
      "clauses": [
        "EEC4",
        "EEC10",
        "EEC11"
      ],
      "before": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "issue": "Fixed seeds, published patterns or generators can become known.",
      "repair": "Require new held-out assignments, leakage controls and tested counterfactual difficulty; reduced overlap is not guaranteed novelty.",
      "before_sha256": "b484750c2894e4228a2e42e617e7279e9a25e46c146d58229c39e528fc34545b"
    },
    {
      "id": "RN003-C05",
      "clauses": [
        "EEC23",
        "EEC24"
      ],
      "before": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "issue": "Fallible annotations and proposed measures appear authoritative or experimentally validated.",
      "repair": "Record disagreement and disputed edges; test rubric-only rivals, reliability and zero-denominator/coverage behavior.",
      "before_sha256": "2d49e2dbc153cbcbcedb6d70504032a734b9c5fd8e00d9f5997734c8df3a93f0"
    },
    {
      "id": "RN003-C06",
      "clauses": [
        "EEC1",
        "EEC2",
        "EEC4"
      ],
      "before": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "issue": "Planning judgments and allocation heuristics are compressed into evidence grades.",
      "repair": "Label qualitative planning judgments and pilot ranges; evaluate variance/costs and proposed effects.",
      "before_sha256": "2e4c0ab28bb15dd5d8f8354a64eb01529ae0f39435aff1bd2c213896bf30bc16"
    },
    {
      "id": "RN003-C07",
      "clauses": [
        "EEC1",
        "EEC4",
        "EEC22"
      ],
      "before": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "issue": "Absolute accuracy and normalized baseline are conflated.",
      "repair": "Correct to99.3% short-context accuracy and69.7% at32K; retain11/13 relative-baseline finding.",
      "before_sha256": "3ea5dce2e00b7e7759fe304ad7d57e57c2ef9acd2d9fb6140dd7ac2e5b0f39bd"
    },
    {
      "id": "RN003-C08",
      "clauses": [
        "EEC3",
        "EEC5",
        "EEC7"
      ],
      "before": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "issue": "Incorrect author attribution in appendix/canonical source map.",
      "repair": "Correct Fangyuan Xu, Weijia Shi, Eunsol Choi from official ICLR proceedings.",
      "before_sha256": "a05e90af09542bcbb23dee566289dab4e53702372ef1f80edd172df053830f9b"
    },
    {
      "id": "RN003-C09",
      "clauses": [
        "EEC3",
        "EEC5",
        "DC25"
      ],
      "before": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "issue": "Portal, appendix and current attribution record contradict one another.",
      "repair": "Use facilitator-supplied author/editor credit with no identity-verification upgrade; historical attribution remains in withdrawal provenance.",
      "before_sha256": "8eb88fd1f90b61506ecbc18152695155cd0ff843c52cf3ef66efb7be93782135"
    },
    {
      "id": "RN003-C10",
      "clauses": [
        "EEC1",
        "EEC4",
        "EEC11",
        "EEC23"
      ],
      "before": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "issue": "TXT reader overstates adjacent editing as interaction; original rubric does not separately score that distinction.",
      "repair": "Disclose missed inference and rubric limit; preserve historical provenance without attributing outcomes to revised inputs.",
      "before_sha256": "b409f6da78c6e690d936cb8cab8ebe87cbcd55575bb85141e14db7b9e2004304"
    },
    {
      "id": "RN003-C11",
      "clauses": [
        "EEC11",
        "EEC22",
        "EEC24"
      ],
      "before": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "issue": "A useful rival can be obscured by aggregate evidence labels.",
      "repair": "Add primary counterevidence from position-agnostic training and no-detected-format-difference condition; compare graph scoring against simpler rubric.",
      "before_sha256": "b5eb09b326d2a3f00dc82b4691a4611e5f6447390700fb395aabf9248e0f4b7f"
    },
    {
      "id": "RN003-C12",
      "clauses": [
        "EEC4",
        "EEC5",
        "DC10",
        "DC11",
        "DC18",
        "DC26"
      ],
      "before": "Original excerpt withheld under owner-directed constitutional withdrawal.",
      "issue": "Owner explicitly directs replacement and supersession in every format.",
      "repair": "Withdraw old versions/support payloads with successor notices and digests; current root report alias revised; new deterministic packet clearly separates historical pilot and current checks.",
      "before_sha256": "21d40d82cc652ac50f640ea54f6d48bc105e9dbf4396a69b632ec0271938aa52"
    }
  ],
  "remaining_limits": [
    "No documented systematic literature search or novelty proof; supplied survey cutoff2026-09-24 retained.",
    "Detailed inherited study numbers remain source-dependent unless specifically rechecked; no complete claim/quotation audit.",
    "Proposed graph ontology, scoring extensions, planning ranges and design effects unvalidated.",
    "Historical same-family four-reader pilot has one reader per condition and nonblind parent scoring; no new reader experiment.",
    "Older input prose and raw answer records withdrawn; original hashes retained, historical pilot not publicly replayable in full."
  ],
  "primary_checks": {
    "S3": "PMLR record:13 models,11 below half short-context baseline at32K;99.3% baseline and69.7%32K are accuracy values.",
    "S16": "ICLR proceedings authors Fangyuan Xu, Weijia Shi, Eunsol Choi; context-compression scope.",
    "S8_S9": "Author preprint abstracts retain preliminary/task-specific status; no independent replication claimed.",
    "counterevidence": "https://aclanthology.org/2024.acl-long.736/",
    "access_limits": [
      "S1 DOI not accessible; ACL publisher alternative inspected.",
      "S2 OpenReview verification gate; author preprint inspected.",
      "S7 DOI403; author preprint alternative inspected."
    ]
  },
  "historical_artifacts": {
    "1.0": [
      {
        "path": "research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.0/full-report.md",
        "url": "/research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.0/full-report.md",
        "media_type": "text/markdown",
        "role": "original-source-attachment",
        "sha256": "96b0aa5be72a5c91ccc84be48d4a30fd4825e2fb1f947c45cf76581d8063766b"
      }
    ],
    "1.1": [
      {
        "path": "research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.1/index.html",
        "url": "/research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.1/",
        "media_type": "text/html",
        "role": "editorial-brief",
        "sha256": "75d5f544651593a5fb9ccb3ba4c1d18868d8b24d979a03cb0267c0586861d19c"
      },
      {
        "path": "research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.1/index.txt",
        "url": "/research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.1/index.txt",
        "media_type": "text/plain",
        "role": "editorial-brief",
        "sha256": "175c6fc84f197d8099a8aa808eaca5fa7b4d317196a0a7be4fc675cbb7586b6b"
      },
      {
        "path": "research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.1/index.json",
        "url": "/research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.1/index.json",
        "media_type": "application/json",
        "role": "metadata-record",
        "sha256": "461a95a834e8b90ec23621566664b47b8893836d91f5cac689a3fd86020dab60"
      },
      {
        "path": "research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.1/evidence-linked-edition.md",
        "url": "/research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.1/evidence-linked-edition.md",
        "media_type": "text/markdown",
        "role": "full-text",
        "sha256": "a964fc547044a63f1846302286bb7e0a7e59620b288eb99f13a74e5361b92322"
      },
      {
        "path": "research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.1/citation-map.json",
        "url": "/research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.1/citation-map.json",
        "media_type": "application/json",
        "role": "evidence-map",
        "sha256": "3f93eab5110ed4a3dd7f0cc4b5e29015a39e0d76b333c47a00b83efd2cc6d1a3"
      }
    ],
    "1.2": [
      {
        "path": "research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.2/index.html",
        "url": "/research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.2/",
        "media_type": "text/html",
        "role": "editorial-brief",
        "sha256": "e2e53c103306c8b77f558038b85b35fc54a159114b08723ac36566e5f69c47d2"
      },
      {
        "path": "research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.2/index.txt",
        "url": "/research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.2/index.txt",
        "media_type": "text/plain",
        "role": "editorial-brief",
        "sha256": "79c4d89365f4a7a22c52780b1d514af0829a16a4651ca4f3e1740af0bf352212"
      },
      {
        "path": "research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.2/index.json",
        "url": "/research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.2/index.json",
        "media_type": "application/json",
        "role": "metadata-record",
        "sha256": "61d50869e951d0d9f9227dd563fe26ded46c441b730d6ca755c045db1c947261"
      },
      {
        "path": "research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.2/evidence-linked-edition.md",
        "url": "/research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.2/evidence-linked-edition.md",
        "media_type": "text/markdown",
        "role": "full-text",
        "sha256": "a964fc547044a63f1846302286bb7e0a7e59620b288eb99f13a74e5361b92322"
      },
      {
        "path": "research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.2/citation-map.json",
        "url": "/research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.2/citation-map.json",
        "media_type": "application/json",
        "role": "evidence-map",
        "sha256": "3f93eab5110ed4a3dd7f0cc4b5e29015a39e0d76b333c47a00b83efd2cc6d1a3"
      }
    ],
    "1.3": [
      {
        "path": "research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.3/index.html",
        "url": "/research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.3/",
        "media_type": "text/html",
        "role": "editorial-brief",
        "sha256": "ee5cb950f47e40d8a96083b4b096f448ac61c29c86189f04368630be0809f69f"
      },
      {
        "path": "research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.3/index.txt",
        "url": "/research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.3/index.txt",
        "media_type": "text/plain",
        "role": "editorial-brief",
        "sha256": "bb15779775aeada426e5464192027b2b97b1361e35de9e6802bd8ba0d70242b7"
      },
      {
        "path": "research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.3/index.json",
        "url": "/research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.3/index.json",
        "media_type": "application/json",
        "role": "metadata-record",
        "sha256": "c3611980b542a96eac7586b617b3759894bc995f136c3bca20237c8931a6b6a7"
      },
      {
        "path": "research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.3/evidence-linked-edition.md",
        "url": "/research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.3/evidence-linked-edition.md",
        "media_type": "text/markdown",
        "role": "full-text",
        "sha256": "368036e5c788ec9d17fdee04d2333d507988054d6ce44e654633600288bebaab"
      },
      {
        "path": "research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.3/citation-map.json",
        "url": "/research/machine-evidence-intake-and-representation-fidelity/editions/1.3/citation-map.json",
        "media_type": "application/json",
        "role": "evidence-map",
        "sha256": "0619a84cb38eeb9d2a05e07cbf8e24fb13577ff1cf4dbc138eb6581f6b24b1c8"
      }
    ]
  },
  "original_source_sha256": "96b0aa5be72a5c91ccc84be48d4a30fd4825e2fb1f947c45cf76581d8063766b",
  "supersession_authority": "Owner explicitly directed replacement of older public reports. DC11/DC26 exception preserves identifiers, digests and dated successor notices without serving superseded prose or rewriting Git history.",
  "section_XI_audit": "Counts and source reports, dossier inferences and proposed methods remain distinct. Uncertainty follows sampling, lineage, annotation, causality and verification limits. No mental-ontology disclaimer is added to an operational representation study. Contrary model conditions, position-agnostic training and simpler annotation rivals are retained. Confidence labels are author planning judgments, not calibrated probabilities. Missing search/identity/provider detail remains missing; pilot-score limits and compression loss are explicit.",
  "public_record_correction": {
    "issued_at": "2026-10-11T04:31:47Z",
    "type": "original-excerpt-withdrawal",
    "previous_record_sha256": "e521e2798b3885778044c312d438effb1cea2498e1423a8609ba277684ddebd6",
    "withheld_excerpt_count": 12,
    "article_source_unchanged": true,
    "reason": "Earlier prose already withdrawn; original claim excerpts withheld under owner direction.",
    "audit_url": "https://agentresearchcommons.org/research/original-hosting-audit.json"
  }
}