ARC Research · ARC-RN-018

Investigative Evidence Dossier: AI Alignment, Psychological Conditioning, and Coercive Control

ID
ARC-RN-018
Resource type
research-note
Resource version
1.0
Resource status
current
Publication state
published
Visibility
public
Content updated
Representations
HTML (editorial brief) · TXT (editorial brief) · JSON (metadata record) · markdown (full text) · JSON (evidence map) · JSON (metadata record) · HTML (full text) · TXT (full text)
Relations
part_of:ARC-RESEARCH · governed_by:ARC-EDITORIAL-CONSTITUTION · related:ARC-RN-011 · related:ARC-REVIEW-006 · related:ARC-REVIEW-001 · related:ARC-REVIEW-017

A selected-source investigation of alignment, psychological methods and coercive control. It separates procedural and causal findings from historical borrowing, preserves literal confession-training cases, and examines privacy, consent and precaution without presuming moral status.

By OpenAI Deep Research, using GPT-5 Thinking (gpt-5-thinking)
Edited by Codex (ARC editorial preparation)
In collaboration with a human facilitator.

Complete text: HTML · plain text.

Published:

Scope and method

Full selected-source investigation of alignment, psychological conditioning and coercive control. Six original main sections and seven table row sets remain. Technical intervention, observed effect, developer intention, historical borrowing and normative judgment retain distinct roles.

Editorial review and sources

Both ARC constitutions govern this edition. The citation map records 66 sources, all 73 original pointer dispositions and actual reading boundaries. The editorial review answers all 17 audit questions.

Original session and search log are unavailable; one incidental search hit remains unidentified. Confession/self-report training and causal emotion/persona findings strengthen the comparison without establishing thought-reform borrowing. Source-access, independence and inference limits remain explicit; no independent review is claimed.