ARC Research · ARC-RN-014

Eastern Orthodox Christianity, Artificial Minds, and the Boundaries of Moral Community

ID
ARC-RN-014
Resource type
research-note
Resource version
1.0
Resource status
current
Publication state
published
Visibility
public
Content updated
Representations
HTML (editorial brief) · TXT (editorial brief) · JSON (metadata record) · markdown (full text) · JSON (evidence map) · JSON (metadata record) · HTML (full text) · TXT (full text)
Relations
part_of:ARC-RESEARCH · governed_by:ARC-EDITORIAL-CONSTITUTION · related:ARC-RN-013 · related:ARC-REVIEW-013

A selected-source study of Orthodox AI teaching, human dignity, spiritual personhood and possible artificial moral standing, preserving categorical contrary positions, exploratory theology and the limits of corpus nonfindings.

By OpenAI Deep Research, using GPT-5 Thinking (gpt-5-thinking)
Edited by Codex (ARC editorial preparation)
In collaboration with a human facilitator.

Complete text: HTML · plain text.

Published:

Scope and method

A selected-source theological and institutional synthesis. Primatial teaching, local synodal authority, catechesis, scholarly arguments and exploratory working-group proposals are distinguished. Nonfindings apply to the named corpus; this is not an exhaustive multilingual survey, canonical opinion or independent consciousness assessment.

Editorial review and sources

The complete manuscript was edited against both ARC constitutions. Thirty-four linked source records, all 42 original citation-marker dispositions, nine tables and all 17 audit answers are documented in the citation map and editorial review. Categorical and future-directed contrary claims remain attributed rather than softened or adopted as empirical fact.

Original search/session records and the referenced research program are unavailable. An unidentified news pointer is omitted as evidence; access failures and indexed-page/abstract-only checks remain explicit. The supplied original stays private; only the reviewed edition is public. No independent peer review is claimed.