ARC Research · ARC-RN-015

Artificial Minds in Eleven Modern Religious Movements: Doctrine, Moral Status, Welfare, Agency, and Religious Standing

ID
ARC-RN-015
Resource type
research-note
Resource version
1.0
Resource status
current
Publication state
published
Visibility
public
Content updated
Representations
HTML (editorial brief) · TXT (editorial brief) · JSON (metadata record) · markdown (full text) · JSON (evidence map) · JSON (metadata record) · HTML (full text) · TXT (full text)
Relations
part_of:ARC-RESEARCH · governed_by:ARC-EDITORIAL-CONSTITUTION · related:ARC-RN-013 · related:ARC-RN-014 · related:ARC-REVIEW-012 · related:ARC-REVIEW-013 · related:ARC-REVIEW-014

Eleven source-specific studies distinguish doctrine, institutional AI policy, artificial consciousness, welfare and religious standing. Explicit contrary positions, synthetic-embodiment questions and unresolved citations remain visible; the supplied bonus material is reviewed in a supplement.

By OpenAI Deep Research, using GPT-5 Thinking (gpt-5-thinking)
Edited by Codex (ARC editorial preparation)
In collaboration with a human facilitator.

Complete text: HTML · plain text.

Published:

Scope and method

Eleven source-specific case studies, eight main tables and a reviewed supplement. Doctrine, institutional policy, participant reporting, named commentary and constructive interpretation have distinct roles. Nonfindings apply to the selected corpus; religious recognition, consciousness and welfare are separate questions.

Editorial review and sources

The complete report and bonus material were reviewed against both ARC constitutions. The citation map records 76 linked sources and all 87 original pointer dispositions; the editorial review answers all 17 audit questions.

Eight pointers remain unrecovered. Original session and referenced brief are unavailable. Direct retrieval failures, partial periodical access, conflicting dates, unverified bonus claims and translation limits remain explicit. Original supplied bytes stay private; no independent review is claimed.